Political Fix / Real Talk, No Kevin Hart / Social Experiments

Is My President Black (enough)?

There was a time when people fiercely fought not to be black.  A time when a drop of black blood made you an outcast in society, valued slightly above chattel.  Even amongst black people, there was a social hierarchy indicative of how much black blood was left in your bloodline.  Today, well-to-do families on the east coast brag about their connections to the First Families of Virginia (FFV), proud of their fair skin, hazel eyes and “good hair”, while ignoring the harsh reality of how that FFV blood infiltrated their lineage.   Though the etymology of blackness has historically been about blood and lineage, its is seemingly adopting a new definition; a definition rooted in cultural and economic foundations (though it can be argued that this has always been a part of how black folks have defined each other, it is now spreading to the point where other races, absent of known lineage and bloodline connections, can be black).  This phenomenon is hastened by the globalization of Hip-Hop and spread of black culture; once again, it’s not a new phenomenon to have black music and culture popular and assimilated into other cultures, however now it is popular to assimilate to the black culture itself, instead of fitting into another framework.  This means that unless you meet the cultural and social criteria of blackness, your bloodline and lineage may still leave you on the wrong side of blackness. 

This is at the base of an argument made by Washington Post contributor and author Fredrick Harris in his excellent article, Still Waiting for the First Black President.  Or at least this is the basis of his argument in my opinion.  In the article, Harris constructs the framework that based on Pres. Obama’s political and social opinions, he is not black.  Because Pres. Obama has not specifically addressed the issues facing the African-American community, choosing instead legislation “that will lift all boats” Harris infers that Obama has failed the litmus test of blackness and we should resume our wait for true black president.  I saw this article on a FB friend’s timeline, s/o to the homie Dr. Kellie, and I am sure Tavis and Cornel approve the message as well.  I, conversely, think Mr. Harris misses the mark.  Not in his assessment of Pres. Obama’s political shortcomings, or in his assertion that the black vote is consistently pimped by political candidates (black, white, democrat, or republican), but whereas ones blackness is defined not by their genetics or lineage, but by their actions and loyalty “the cause”.  It sets a dangerous precedent, one which is already threatening our communities.  We have all heard the argument before, some of us have been on different ends of the spectrum, that so and so talks white or ol’ buddy (that happens to be white) acts black.  These types of delineations of culture confine a people to a particular set of characteristics, creating a modern caste system.  There is enough in our community to worry about, without adding a caste system that determines how you act, speak, think, dress, and aspire. 

I am not qualified to debate the ontology of blackness, but I do know if in our attempt to define blackness, we omit proper genetic criterion, we are taking a step backwards.  I dare not suggest every person of African origin is black, which would be an insult to the various ancestors of melanin-filled people around the world!   “Lumping us all together”, Debra Dickerson wrote, “erases the significance of slavery and continuing racism while giving the appearance of progress”.  Blackness is about the shared history people of color in this country have.  It is about the progress we have made as a culture and our contributions to history and to the world.  Blackness is about the breadth and depth of our experiences and socioeconomic statuses.  Blackness is difficult to define, but you know it when you see it.  There is no criterion, other than being a descendant of the Africans bought to America, which comprises blackness.  So if you want to say Pres. Obama is not black, because of his lineage or bloodline, I’m cool with that.  But to question it based your criteria of blackness, is a fallacy and historically in accurate.  According to the framework set up in Harris’ Washington Post article, the argument can be made that quiet a few people that fit the scientific, genealogical definition of black would be excluded from the group because their behavior doesn’t align with a loosely compiled and agreed upon Black agenda.  That’s like saying your drunk uncle, that embarrass the hell out of the entire family, isn’t your uncle anymore because he is embarrassing.  Stop it!! Just because you do not claim him, doesn’t make any less a part of your family, or less embarrassing.

So what do you think, is President Obama black enough for you?  Is he even black at all?  Does any of that matter if he is not doing what you thought he would in office?  Can we define blackness? Should we define blackness?


8 thoughts on “Is My President Black (enough)?

  1. He’s the President of the United States, not the President of Black People. Only old people and idiots think he’s gonna cater to “the cause” or issues that only affect black people. Niggas can’t be satisfied for shit. And I hate to say that as a generalization, but it’s the truth. Paul Pierce.

    • But he has addressed issues of other groups. He addressed issues of gay americans, mexican americans, rich americans, corporations, environmentalist. Why not black people? he addressed issues of people in other countries, they aren’t even american!!! Why can’t black people get a shout out?

  2. It’s a Negro President Charlie Brown!!!

    -So what do you think, is President Obama black enough for you? He’s black enough for me (Whatever the hell that means.) I need him to lead in the most effective manner possible under the given circumstnaces. The is he “black at all” question is one of the yokes that is still around our neck that will continue to drag us down.

    -Does any of that matter if he is not doing what you thought he would in office? This is an interesting question. The left and blacks were so caught up in the euphoria of electing an “All new. All Different” President many forgot a few things. A) No president, ever has completed all of his goals domestically or on the foreign policy front. (Actually he said he would continue the various wars and conflicts that were in play several times on the campaign trail but again no one listened.) B) The rate of the polarization that came into play months later and the mid-terms is daunting.

    – Can we define blackness? Should we define blackness? No. Hell no! F**K no! It’s cute to try in a satirical manner but if you have toin reality question another persons racial authenticity things obviously aren’t as bad we’re being told. Find bigger problems to solve.

    Honestly, I think Barack could do more by making a statement about “black problems”. These statements will also come with negative commentary from the Soul Patrol (West, Smiley, Dyson & Glaude) saying “He’s talking down to us.” or “He’s waited too long to act.” (I still think the Soul Patrol is upset that they didn’t get to attend the White House Memorial Crab-Crack ’09. Should’ve RSVP’d) Many “black folk problems” need to be addressed on the state and local level. Areas that are well out of his executive purview, much like his statements about “gay marriage”. Outside of strong legislation his actions would only serve to be opinions and thoughts. Yes, they would be very influential opinions and thoughts but most of our problems need to be handled by our governors, mayors, school boards, and city councils.

    • I agree that most of issues facing black people can and should be addressed on levels below the federal govt, but like you said, if he spoke on certain issues it would offer “very influential opinions and thoughts”. In the past presidents have used their position to influence legislation on the state and local levels. I think Pres. Obama has struggled to do so and interestingly so, because he had such a strong “street team” during the campaign. We kind of chopped his legs from him with the mid-term elections.

      I think the better question is not if Obama is black enough for Black America, but is he too black for america in general!? More than any new revelations about black culture, his term in office has revealed the progress or lack thereof that our country has made in race relations. the wounds are still fresh and the fears and prejudices of white americans still prevelant

      • “I think the better question is not if Obama is black enough for Black America, but is he too black for america in general!?”

        So essentially being a black president is like being a black policeman. “Your” people only see the position and uniform and the rest of the people only see your skin.

  3. Pingback: You Can Be a Nigger, Too??? « From Ashy to Classy

Speak on it!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s